Obamacare Saves Lives

Opponents of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) ignore the fact that thousands of uninsured Americans die unnecessarily from treatable conditions. A 2009 study conducted at Harvard Medical School and published in the American Journal of Public Health found that 45,000 deaths are associated with lack of health insurance in the U.S. each year (1).

The Affordable Care Act has already increased the number of insured Americans and will do more in 2014 when all its provisions are in effect (2).
The Affordable Care Act also will help states to expand Medicaid in 2014, providing health care coverage to people who cannot afford insurance. To study the impact of this expansion, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health looked at states that have already expanded Medicaid (3). The researchers found that Medicaid expansions prevented 19.6 deaths per 100,000 adults, concluding: “State Medicaid expansions to cover low-income adults were significantly associated with reduced mortality as well as improved coverage, access to care, and self-reported health.”

Politicians like Mitt Romney who threaten to overturn the Affordable Care Act put politics ahead of American lives.

Continue Obama Success vs. Return to GOP Failure: The Choice Is Yours

Mitt Romney’ entire campaign is focused on criticizing President Obama’s handling of the economy. But the latest economic indicators—including employment and home sales— show that the U.S. economy continues to improve (1).

You may recall that when Obama took office, eight years of failed Republican economic policy had our economy on the brink of disaster. As this 2009 Bloomberg article states: “The economy in the U.S. probably grew in the third quarter at the fastest pace in two years as government stimulus helped bring an end to the worst recession since the 1930s, economists said” (2).

President Obama’s foreign policy has also been successful. In fact, Mitt Romney agreed with him more often than he disagreed during the foreign policy debate. Obama has put together exit strategies to end the wars George W. Bush started, and he hunted down Osama bin Laden, which Bush failed to do. But 17 of Romney’s 24 foreign policy advisors are from George W. Bush’s administration. These are the architects of failure (3).

In a democracy, people get the government they deserve. If voters are fooled into turning away from successful policies in favor of policies that are proven to fail, we’ll get exactly what we deserve.

A Plea to My Fellow Christians

Conservative Christians should back off of social issues like gay marriage and abortion. I say this not because I fundamentally disagree with my fellow Christians on both these issues, but because the perception of Christians as hard-liners drives people away from the church.

I’m not asking anyone to support gay marriage if their beliefs say otherwise. Some Christian denominations allow it and others do not, just as churches have different beliefs about remarriage for divorced people. But if Christians  cease our opposition to legal, secular gay marriage, we can make friends instead of enemies. And when some of these friends are at a point in their lives when they need God’s word, we can be there to help. But if we are perceived as hateful or oppressive, no one will listen when we tell them about God’s love.  

Likewise, we should work to reduce the number of abortions by means other than legislation. Although I agree that abortion is wrong, half the people in this country do not. People will not obey laws prohibiting an activity they do not think is morally wrong—if laws stopped such behavior, we would not have illegal drug use and illegal immigration. Rather, we should support efforts to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, and we should support policies that ensure expectant mothers will not have to worry about health care for themselves or their babies. Making it affordable for mothers to keep their babies—or for couples to adopt—could more effectively reduce the number of abortions than would overturning Roe v. Wade.

If we truly love our neighbors, we need to show it. 1 John 4:8 says, “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.” Jesus befriended the poor and the outcasts of his society. We should do likewise, and single mothers and gays often feel like outcasts in our society. Jesus told us to “go and make disciples of all” (Matthew 29:19). We cannot make disciples if we are making enemies.

'Atlas Shrugged' Resembles Reality Like Hogwarts Resembles Your Local High School

It’s hard to understand why the atheist views of Ayn Rand have such a strong influence on the Republican base, of whom at least 90% express a belief in God and 50% describe themselves as evangelical Christians (1,2).  
The one relevant point Rand made is that innovators deserve to profit from their inventions and should not be taxed excessively. Aside from this rather obvious nugget, Rand’s novels are drivel that are incompatible with traditional Judeo-Christian values such as charity and American values such as volunteerism.
Politicians like Paul Ryan, who based his agenda on Rand’s views, fail to see that the world has changed since Atlas Shrugged was written (in 1957, the top tax rate for regular income was 91%; in 2012 it is 37.9% [3]) or that Rand’s dystopian world resembles reality about as much as your local high school resembles Hogwarts.
First, the hero-capitalists of Atlas Shrugged all produce useful products or services: Dagny Taggart operates a railroad, Hank Rearden manufactures steel and invents a super-strong alloy, and John Galt invents a more efficient automobile engine. They exemplify Rand’s notion of the “virtue of selfishness.” In the modern world, we see a few innovators like Steve Jobs or Bill Gates, but we also see investment bankers getting rich by manipulating interest rates and laundering money. Is this selfishness also virtuous?
Second, Rand’s heroes employ American labor. If Hank Rearden laid off the workers at his steel mill and moved production to a third-world country where people work 14-hour days in unsafe conditions at near-slave wages, is he still a hero?
Third, no one gets sick in Atlas Shrugged. What would happen in real life if John Galt had been diagnosed with heart disease or cancer after he walked away from his job at the auto company? He would have no health insurance, and he would go bankrupt and leave the rest of us would pay the bill, one way or another. Is he then still the ultimate capitalist?
Fourth, Rand does not address the real-life problem of pollution. She rails against all forms of government regulation, but what if Dagny Taggart decided that she could save money by not installing any pollution controls on her locomotives? In real life, without regulation, companies are able to pass the costs of pollution (damage to our health, damage to crops, etc.) on to the rest of us. Is this selfishness virtuous?
Selfishness is never virtuous. The next time a conservative “Christian” suggests otherwise, ask him or her to look up Matthew 6:24, Luke 18:24, or 1 Timothy 6:10.

Bible Quiz for Conservative Christians

1. Jesus said, “Sell all that you have and give to the ____.”
A. “poor.” (Luke 18:22)
B. “rich, because some of it might eventually trickle down to the poor.” (Conservative politicians)

2. Jesus said, “Blessed are the ______makers.”
A. “peace” (Matthew 5:9)
B. “war” (GW Bush)

3. When asked whether people should pay taxes to Rome, Jesus pointed to Caesars’ image on a coin and said:
A. “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's …” (Mark 12:17)
B. “Render unto your offshore tax shelter the things that are yours.” (Mitt Romney)

4. Regarding homosexuality, Jesus said:
A. Nothing. (All the gospels)
B. Nothing, but since none of my close friends are gay, I’ll go ahead and assume they’ll all go to hell. (Misguided Christians whose prejudice overshadows their compassion)

5. Jesus healed the ______.
A. Sick. (Matthew 10:8)
B. I don't care; people are responsible for their own health care. (Misguided Christians whose political views overshadow their compassion)

Answer Key: If you answered B to any of these questions, please stop listening to James Dobson and other false prophets.

Republicans Play Politics with American Lives ... Again

Despite the Supreme Court’s decision that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is constitutional, Texas Governor Rick Perry recently announced that he has “no intention” of expanding Medicaid or setting up the health insurances exchanges required by the PPACA.

Perry and other Republicans continue to block health care reform in Texas despite a federal government report ranking our state dead last in overall health (1). Republicans nationwide continue to fight health care reform despite a recent study finding that more than 26,000 adults die prematurely in the United States each year because they lack health insurance (2). A 2009 study conducted at Harvard Medical School and published in the American Journal of Public Health found that 45,000 annual deaths are associated with lack of health insurance in the U.S. (3).
Republicans are putting politics ahead of American lives. This has to end. Please write your Republican governors, congressmen, and senators and demand that they stop playing politics with human lives. And please do not reward their despicable behavior with your vote this November.

Sources:

Did the GOP Sabotage Our Economy?

We already know the Republican theme for the 2012 election: Blame Obama for the slowness of the economic recovery.

But Republicans have opposed all of Obama’s attempts at reform. In 2011, they blocked a stimulus bill that would have created jobs without increasing the deficit. According to The New York Times:

“While Republicans have derided the 2009 stimulus as a failure, the consensus among economists has been that it helped stave off deeper job losses and supported a modest recovery. …
[In 2011] Mr. Obama went before Congress in September to push for a $447 billion package of tax cuts and new government spending.
The centerpiece of the bill, known as the American Jobs Act, is an extension and expansion of the cut in payroll taxes, worth $240 billion, under which the tax paid by employees would be cut in half through 2012. Smaller businesses would also get a cut in their payroll taxes, as well as a tax holiday for hiring new employees. The plan also provides $140 billion for modernizing schools and repairing roads and bridges … but Republicans blocked the package from coming to a vote.
Democrats responded by breaking it into pieces, hoping to pass those considered likeliest to gain bipartisan support, including some ideas that had originated with Republicans. But the first test of that approach, a bill to provide $35 billion to state and local governments to prevent layoffs of teachers, police officers and firefighters, was also blocked by a Republican filibuster.”(1)
Michael Cohen in The Guardian points out that the Republicans now oppose economic policies once supported by conservatives:
“Republicans have opposed a lion's share of stimulus measures that once they supported, such as a payroll tax break, which they grudgingly embraced earlier this year. Even unemployment insurance, a relatively uncontroversial tool for helping those in an economic downturn, has been consistently held up by Republicans or used as a bargaining chip for more tax cuts. Ten years ago, prominent conservatives were loudly making the case for fiscal stimulus to get the economy going; today, they treat such ideas like they're the plague.
Traditionally, during economic recessions, Republicans have been supportive of loose monetary policy. Not this time. Rather, Republicans have upbraided Ben Bernanke, head of the Federal Reserve, for even considering policies that focus on growing the economy and creating jobs.
And then, there is the fact that since the original stimulus bill passed in February of 2009, Republicans have made practically no effort to draft comprehensive job creation legislation. Instead, they continue to pursue austerity policies, which reams of historical data suggest harms economic recovery and does little to create jobs. In fact, since taking control of the House of Representatives in 2011, Republicans have proposed hardly a single major jobs bill that didn't revolve, in some way, around their one-stop solution for all the nation's economic problems: more tax cuts.” (2)
Are the Republicans making a principled stand because they have a solution to our economic problems? No, they offer nothing but the same policies that were in place when the recession began. The Republicans care about one thing and one thing only:
“The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” - Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
The Republicans have shown through their actions and their words that they care more about winning elections than in putting Americans back to work. Only a fool would reward such bad behavior by Republicans with a vote this November.
Sources:
(2) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/09/did-republicans-deliberately-crash-us-economy